Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913

Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier

Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 4, 1913
144 N.Y.S. 320 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Horace Hord, of New York City, for appellant., Samuel Bitterman, of New York City, for respondent.

Belrose Realty Co. v. Maier

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a final order in summary proceedings removing her as a squatter from possession of a toilet room in the rear of premises demised by her.

The terms of the lease indicate that use of the toilet room by the defendant as appurtenant of the premises occupied by her was plainly contemplated. As the provisions of section 2232 of the Code of Civil Procedure do not apply to such a case, the order was improperly made, and must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.