Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Read Printing Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.

Read Printing Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 5, 1914 · Guy
146 N.Y.S. 194 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Bridges, Bacon & Jones, of New York City (Henry W. Bridges, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Samuel Wasserman, of New York City, for respondent.

Read Printing Co. v. J. J. Little & Ives Co.

Opinion of the Court

GUY, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court, without a jury, in an action brought to recover a balance due for goods sold and delivered. A dispute arose as to certain items, first, whether the last bill rendered by plaintiff should be $136 or $130, next as to a discount of $10 claimed by defendant. (See S. M. page 4.) A representative of plaintiff called at defendant’s office, and, as a result of a conversation held by him with defendant, a statement of account was prepared by defendant in accordance with defendant’s • understanding and forwarded by defendant to plaintiff with a check stated by defendant to be in settlement of account, and that plaintiff fully understood the purpose for which the check was sent is shown by the fact that, on the same day, plaintiff sent, in reply to defendant, a letter beginning with the words:

“Relative to your statement oí even date and your check for $470.56, which you tender in settlement of our account, stating that plaintiff claimed a larger amount due and requesting an additional check from defendant.”

To this defendant replied repeating the statement that the check was sent in full settlement of the account and explaining in detail the arrangement made with plaintiff’s representative. Notwithstanding this correspondence, plaintiff retained the check and converted it into cash. The retention of' the check under these circumstances constituted an accord and satisfaction.

The judgment must therefore be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.