Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Titus v. Spencer

Titus v. Spencer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 7, 1914
147 N.Y.S. 343 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

William H. Darrow, of New York City, for appellant., Booth & Ellis, of New York City, for respondent.

Titus v. Spencer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We think that it was error, to admit, over the objection of defendant, the evidence of the plaintiff as to the value of his services rendered to the deceased. Such testimony was within the inhibition of section 829 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

PAGE, J., taking no part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.