Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store

Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 7, 1914
147 N.Y.S. 346 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Jacob Manheim, of New York City, for appellant., Samuel Kahan, of New York City (Benjamin Levinson, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent. '

Greenberg v. Bernikow Family Liquor Store

Opinion of the Court

PAGE, J.

This action is to recover for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiff sold and delivered certain plumbing materials, which were installed in buildings at Arverne, Long Island, that were not owned by the defendant. These goods were ordered by A. Bernikow, were shipped to A. Bernikow, and a statement thereafter sent to A. Bernikow. While A. Bernikow was the treasurer of the defendant, he did not purport to act for it in this transaction. The sole connection that the defendant corporation appears to have had with the matter was that at the time the contract was made A. Bernikow drew a check on the defendants bank account, signed by himself as treasurer, for a portion of the purchase price, and gave the defendant’s note for the balance due on the first shipment. The note and check were both paid, and this action is to recover for the remaining goods covered by the contract and shipped after this first transaction was completed. The defendant was engaged in the liquor business in Grand street, New York, and was not shown to have any interest in or relation to the buildings at Arverne. There was no fact proved upon which to predicate defendant’s liability.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.