Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Wagner v. Mishel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 18, 1914

148 N.Y.S. 1148 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

House, Grossman & Vorhaus, of New York City, for appellants., Henry Silverman, of New York City, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The testimony in this case shows that the workmanship -upon the catalogues for the printing of which the plaintiff brought this action is of a most inferior quality, rendering them entirely unfit for the purposes for which the plaintiff knew that they were intended, and the testimony to that effect is fully confirmed by an examination of fhe specimens *1149offered in evidence and submitted upon the hearing of this appeal. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Costs in this action to be offset ngainst the audgment in No. 112.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.