Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Amendola v. Ruggiero

Amendola v. Ruggiero
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 19, 1914 · Seabury
149 N.Y.S. 907 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Gabriel Rubino, of New York City, for appellant., Felix Antonacchio, of New York City, for respondent.

Amendola v. Ruggiero

Opinion of the Court

SEABURY, J.

The plaintiff sued in replevin to recover a gold watch chain and a bracelet, alleged to be worth $40.50, or the thereof. The court below awarded judgment for the plaintiff in conversion for $40.50.

The judgment is modified, by striking out the provision awarding judgment in conversion, and so as to award the plaintiff the chattels sued for, or $40.50, the value thereof. As modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs to either party. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.