Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Donald Steamship Co. v. Lewis

Donald Steamship Co. v. Lewis
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 4, 1914
150 N.Y.S. 89 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Ralph James M. Bullowa, of New York City (Emilie M. Bullowa, and Ralph James M. Bullowa, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Henry Woog, of New York City, for respondent.

Donald Steamship Co. v. Lewis

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In our view of this case, both causes of action alleged in the complaint _ involve an accounting between copartners. The causes of action were not, therefore, within the jurisdiction of the City Court, and the complaint as to each cause of action should have been dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff to bring a new action in a court of competent jurisdiction. The learned court below properly dismissed the first cause of action, but erroneously directed judgment for the defendant upon the second cause of action.

The judgment is modified, by providing that the complaint be dismissed as to the first and second cause of action, and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.