Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914

Granat v. Mendetz

Granat v. Mendetz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 14, 1914 · Guy
150 N.Y.S. 438 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Morris & Samuel Meyers, of New York City, for appellants., Jacob Manheim, of New York City, for respondent.

Granat v. Mendetz

Opinion of the Court

GUY, J.

The action was brought to recover for the breach of an alleged contract of employment for one year at $50 a week. answer denied the contract as pleaded, and set up a conditional contract, for the alleged breach, of which, as well as for other alleged improper it averred was

Defendant moved, among other things, for a bill of particulars as to whether said contract was oral or in writing, and, if in writing, for a copy thereof. Either party is entitled to know whether the alleged contract under which his opponent claims, when its terms are in dispute, is oral or in writing, and, if the latter, to have a copy thereof. Cozzens v. American General Engineering Co., 126 App. Div. 942, 111 N. Y. Supp. 350; Alleghany Iron Co. v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 87, 88, 74 N. Y. Supp. 514. _

_ Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.