Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Borgia & Patane, Inc. v. Paris

Borgia & Patane, Inc. v. Paris
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 15, 1915 · Blitir, Shearn
92 Misc. 211; 155 N.Y.S. 347

Counsel

Lind & Pfeiffer (Alexander Pfeiffer, of counsel), for appellant., Alfonso Bivona, for respondent.

Borgia & Patane, Inc. v. Paris

Opinion of the Court

Shearn, J.

One justice of the Municipal Court has no authority to vacate a judgment entered after a trial before another justice on the ground of irregularities in that trial. Moreover, there was no irregularity in conducting the trial without a stenographer where that was done upon stipulation of both sides. The stipulation was in the interest of economy, and evidently contemplated the waiver of an appeal Dubuc v. Lazell, Dalley & Co., 182 N. Y. 482. I know of no reason why a stipulation in an action in the Municipal Court is not just as binding as a stipulation in an action in any other court.

Order reversed; with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated; judgment to be set off against the costs of appeal.

Blitir and Page, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.