Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Raisin v. Schechtman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 15, 1915

151 N.Y.S. 276 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Floyd K. Diefendorf, of New York City (John T. Fadden, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Eugene Moskovitz, of New York City (Sydney Rosenthal, of Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The court has no power to strike out portions of defendant’s answer as sham or frivolous which put in issue material allegations of the complaint. Schlesinger v. McDonald, 106 App. Div. 570, 94 N. Y. Supp. 721; Howe v. Elwell, 57 App. Div. 357, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1108; Alexander v. Aronson, 65 App. Div. 174, 72 N. Y. Supp. 640.

The order must therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.