Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Gordon Dry Gin Co. v. Reilly

Gordon Dry Gin Co. v. Reilly
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 13, 1915 · Pendleton
153 N.Y.S. 226 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Kiernan & Moore, of New York City (Maurice J. Moore, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Winslow, Keenan & Budd, of New York City (H. Irwin Keenan, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Gordon Dry Gin Co. v. Reilly

Opinion of the Court

PENDLETON, J.

The only difference between this case and No. 125, entitled John Jameson & Son, Ltd., v. John Reilly, 153 N. Y. Supp. 225, is that here there was an allegation of publication in the complaint, which was alleged to:be defective. As no publication is necessary at all (see opinion in John Jameson & Son, Ltd., v. Reilly, No. 125), it is unnecessary to consider this question.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.