Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Koch v. Siff

Koch v. Siff
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 28, 1915
154 N.Y.S. 223 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Joseph Sapinsky, of New York City, for appellants., Mervyn Wolff, of New York City, for respondent.

Koch v. Siff

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

As the evidence clearly shows that the plaintiff left the employ of the defendants on account of his fear of strikers, who had assaulted him .on the street, and was not discharged or requested to leave, there is no ground for allowing him to recover his unearned wages. On the other hand, the defendants consented to his leaving, and should not be allowed to retain the $50 deposit.

The recovery should therefore be reduced to $62, the amount of the deposit, and $12 for the three days’ work for which he received no pay, plus the costs and disbursements, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.