Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.

Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 3, 1915 · Shearn
155 N.Y.S. 358 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Alex B. Greenberg, of New York City, for appellant., Robert E. Noah, of New York City, for respondent.

Krahe v. Electric Conservation Co.

Opinion of the Court

SHEARN, J.

The evidence to uphold the court’s finding that plaintiff -was the procuring cause of the contract, while unsatisfactory, might be sufficient to sustain the judgment, if there were any evidence upon which the amount of the commission could be predicated. The contract was not introduced in evidence, and the record discloses nothing but a statement made to the court by plaintiff’s attorney concerning the amount of the contract.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.