Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915

Welling v. Morrell

Welling v. Morrell
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 30, 1915
156 N.Y.S. 562 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

John T. Loew, of New York City, for appellant., Sobel & Brand, of New York City, for respondent.

Welling v. Morrell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] At the end of the stenographer’s minutes in this case it appears that the justice who tried the case said: “Judgment for the plaintiff for $367.” This was evidently a mistake, as the judgment actually rendered was for the sum of $240, as appears by the judgment contained in the record, which must control. A correct computation, however, shows that the plaintiff is entitled to but $238.

Judgment modified, by reducing the amount of recovery to the sum of $238, with appropriate costs in the court below, and, as modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to the respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.