Kramer v. Pounds
Opinion of the Court
In the fall of 1912 plaintiff, with defendant and one Williamson, was interested in the development of a tract of land in New Jersey, and one Cox was their active representative and agent in connection therewith. In December, 1912, plaintiff advanced to the syndicate $5,000, for which he was to receive stock in a company to be formed to the extent of a quarter interest therein. To meet mortgage interest, it became necessary, in January, 1913, for the associates to raise money, and plaintiff gave to defendant his note for $1,000 as his share thereof. Defendant discounted said note and deposited the avails thereof in his personal bank account, and from time to time paid over to Cox for the uses of the syndicate the said $1,000,
The judgment rendered for defendant we think unauthorized upon the facts presented. It is clearly apparent that the $1,000 advancement made by plaintiff was upon the distinct understanding, had with defendant, that when he (defendant) was reimbursed therefor by the company that he would return the same to plaintiff. The proof shows that the company has liquidated this $1,000 indebtedness in the manner above described. What Cranford, the transferee of the note received by defendant in payment of the company’s indebtedness, did therewith, is of no concern in this litigation.
Judgment for defendant reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $250, with interest and appropriate costs in the court below.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.