Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

Mead v. Zika

Mead v. Zika
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 26, 1916
159 N.Y.S. 181 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

J. V. Rooney, of New York City, for appellant., Charles Recht, of New York City (Sidney R. Fleischer, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Mead v. Zika

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

[1, 2] No appeal will lie from an order granting or denying a motion for a retaxation of costs. The order can only be reviewed upon an appeal from the judgment. No question of the jurisdiction of the court arises in this case, and therefore it does not fall within the purview of section 154, subdivision 8, of the Municipal Court Code.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.