Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

Harris v. Sandow Realty Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 26, 1916

159 N.Y.S. 892 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Isadore Apfel, of New York City, for appellant., Arthur Knox, of New York City (Percy E. Griffin, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal herein states that the appeal is taken from an order dated May 5, 1916. No order of that date i? contained in the return. There is an order, dated May 3, 1916, which grants a motion for a bill of particulars.

[1, 2] Such an order is not appealable. Section 154, M. C. C. There is also an unsigned order, dated May 3, 1916, and apparently indorsed *893thereon is a notice that the same will be submitted to the justice, who granted the other order, for signature on May 5, 1916; but such order is not signed, and, although the appellant’s brief is devoted to a discussion of the last-mentioned order, as the return fails to show that such order was ever signed, this court cannot consider it.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.