Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

Frank v. Pennaccso

Frank v. Pennaccso
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 17, 1916 · Bijur
160 N.Y.S. 1003 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Nicholas Selvaggi, of New York City, for appellant., Maxwell Arent, of New York City, for respondent.

Frank v. Pennaccso

Opinion of the Court

BIJUR, J.

It is not necessary to determine the many points raised on this appeal because of the “fatal objections to the order,” in that “it does not contain the absolutely necessary adjudication” that the act for which the party is punished “was calculated to or actually did defeat, impair, impede, or prejudice the rights or remedies of the complaining party.” Guerrier v. Coleman, 135 App. Div. 46, 119 N. Y. Supp. 895; Judiciary Law, § 770.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave, however, to renew the motion in the court below. All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.