Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916

B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 17, 1916

160 N.Y.S. 1047 (New York Supplement)

Counsel

Ruskay & Ruskay, of New York City (Cecil B. Ruskay, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Goldfogle & Dorf, of New York City (Henry M. Goldfogle, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

There is complete absence of even an appearance of an intent to violate the judge’s order. An accidental and unintentional violation should not be visited with discipline. The creditor’s rights were in no respect injured and the examination of the debtor was duly completed.

The order appealed from was an abuse of discretion.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.