Smith v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Opinion of the Court
The infant plaintiff, in the custody of her mother, was a passenger on a subway train operated by the defendant. Before
At the close of plaintiff’s case the court, on motion of defendant’s counsel, dismissed the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to prove negligence on the part of defendant. In so ruling the learned court erred. The car and the tube in which it was being operated by the defendant being in defendant’s control, it was defendant’s duty to use reasonable care to transport its passengers in safety. The smoke-filled condition of the car in which plaintiff was seated and the other cars through which plaintiff was compelled to pass to make her exit in safety was a condition which would not exist in the usual course of events in the absence of negligence on the part of the defendant, which was in control thereof and in the absence of explanation as to the cause of such condition the defendant would be liable for damages suffered by its passengers by reason thereof.
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
Bijur and Mullan, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.