Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924

Secor v. Heyman

Secor v. Heyman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 8, 1924
123 Misc. 168; 205 N.Y.S. 348; 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 939

Counsel

. Philip C. Samuels (Philip C. Samuels and Max Lazarus, of counsel), for the appellants., Abraham B. Keve, for the respondent.

Secor v. Heyman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In an action instituted by a firm of stockbrokers to recover against its customer the price of certain stock purchased on his behalf, the defendant’s counsel in his summation to the jury said: “ There is many a man sitting on the benches in the park because he lost his money down in Wall street.” This remark was unwarranted and grossly prejudicial to plaintiffs’ rights, and demands a reversal of the judgment and a new trial.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellants to abide the event.

Wagner and Wasservogel, JJ., concur; Guy, J., dissents.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.