Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924

Krinsky v. Bank of United States

Krinsky v. Bank of United States
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 11, 1924
123 Misc. 924; 206 N.Y.S. 712; 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1254

Counsel

Frachman & Robins (Joseph H. Robins, of counsel), for the appellant., Jacobson & Pollock (H. Louis Jacobson, of counsel), for the respondent.

Krinsky v. Bank of United States

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff sued for the amount which he had paid defendant for the latter’s agreement to make a payment abroad in foreign money. He proved that defendant had told him that the transfer would be accomplished by means of a check which defendant gave him (Safian v. Irving Nat. Bank, 202 App. Div. 459, 460); that the first check was lost, whereupon defendant substituted a second, and that when that was not paid, defendant took the check back.

The action was clearly not one on the draft, but for money had and received upon rescission of the contract, which plaintiff had the right to rescind upon non-performance and which he proved was rescinded by mutual consent.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Gut, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.