Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924

Negreen v. Stokes

Negreen v. Stokes
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 18, 1924
123 Misc. 929; 206 N.Y.S. 608; 1924 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1230

Counsel

Sidney L. Masoné, for the appellant., Jenlcs & Rogers (Gustavus A. Rogers, of counsel), for the respondent.

Negreen v. Stokes

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

After the entry of the order of this court reversing the order of the court below opening the defendant’s default and reinstating the judgments, the court below was without power to reopen the default, the Appellate Term not having given leave to renew. Moreover no fact was shown on the renewed motion that was not either shown or well known to the defendant when the first motion was made. Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387; American Dry Plate Co. v. N. Y. Ferrotype Co., 200 id. 115; Kirkpatrick Home for Childless Women v. Kenyon, 209 App, Div. 179.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, motion denied, and judgments reinstated.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.