Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925

Boslowitz v. S. Goldin & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 9, 1925

124 Misc. 746; 209 N.Y.S. 308; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 760

Counsel

Morse S. Hirsch, for the appellant., Snitkin & Goodman [Abraham' Goodman of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The trial justice, having heard and denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict in plaintiff’s favor at the term at which the action was tried, and judgment having been entered, was without power to grant the defendant what was in effect a rehearing thereon after the expiration of the term at which the action was tried and upon such rehearing to grant the motion to set aside the verdict. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 549; Clancy v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 226 N. Y. 213; Ellis v. Hearn, 132 App. Div. 207.)

Order of February 25, 1924, reversed, with costs, and judgment reinstated. Appeal from order of December 6, 1923, dismissed.

All concur; present, Bijur, Mitchell and Proskauer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.