Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925

Feldman v. Klosk Bros.

Feldman v. Klosk Bros.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 7, 1925
124 Misc. 879; 209 N.Y.S. 764; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 804

Counsel

Deiches, Goldwater & Flynn [Monroe Goldwater of counsel], for the appellant., J. Arthur Hilton, for the respondent.

Feldman v. Klosk Bros.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

It was prejudicial to the rights of appellant for the trial court to state to the jury after passing upon a request to charge You can take your exception and any other - exception you want to. It won’t do you much good.” Because of this, the judgment entered upon the verdict rendered in favor of the respondent must be reversed .and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.