Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925

Dolan v. Dolan

Dolan v. Dolan
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 22, 1925
125 Misc. 849; 211 N.Y.S. 507; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 952

Counsel

William J. McDermott, for the appellant., Joseph Katz, for the respondent.

Dolan v. Dolan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with fifteen dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Under section 532 of the Real Property Law (as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 930), an action at law may be maintained by one joint tenant or one tenant in common against another to recover his just proportion of the rent where the tenant sued has received more than his just proportion. While a court of equity also has jurisdiction in such a case, its jurisdiction is concurrent and not exclusive. (Joslyn v. Joslyn, 9 Hun, 388-390; Wright v. Wright, 59 How. Pr. 176, 184; Coakley v. Mahar, 36 Hun, 157; Maekotter v. Maekotter, 74 Misc. 214, 216; Minion v. Warner, 185 App. Div. 246, 247; 238 N. Y. 413, 417, 418.)

Tenants by the entirety come within the foregoing rule. (Matter of Goodrich v. Village of Otego, 216 N. Y. 112, 117.)

Present: Cropsey, Lazansky and MacCrate, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.