Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925

Fredericks v. Lederer

Fredericks v. Lederer
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 11, 1925
126 Misc. 184; 212 N.Y.S. 614; 1925 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1140

Counsel

John J. Hanrahan, for the appellants., Nathan Waxman, for the respondent .

Fredericks v. Lederer

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The objections to the act of 1896 pointed out in Schnaier v. Navarre Hotel & Importation Co. (182 N. Y. 83) have been removed in the present statute (Greater New York Charter, §§ 415-a, 416-a).

Any employing or master plmnber may now register though he is only to receive a certificate of such registration if he holds a certificate of the examining board. It is the registration of its members, merely, and not the holding of a certificate, that is made a condition precedent to the conduct of business by a copartnership. Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Churchill, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.