Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Grosner v. Gropper Knitting Mills, Inc.

Grosner v. Gropper Knitting Mills, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 28, 1926
126 Misc. 370; 213 N.Y.S. 433; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 570

Counsel

Isidor Neuwirth [George D. Zahn of counsel], for the appellant., Manuel M. Voit, for the respondent.

Grosner v. Gropper Knitting Mills, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The rule that failure to perform a service contract while it is in force, resulting in a discharge for cause, gives the servant no action, has no applicability in this case. The contract here was at will; for the employer could bring it to an end at any time. The employer so elected. The servant had, therefore, completed the term and the employer’s remedy for a breach of part of the contract was by counterclaim. As the amount due plaintiff (if any sum was due) was stipulated and as the employer conceded that the breach was so minor in character that no money damages would accrue, the court was correct in its first ruling in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The setting aside of that Verdict and the dismissal of the complaint was error. Judgment and order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and verdict for plaintiff reinstated.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.