Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Birmberg v. Isquith

Birmberg v. Isquith
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 8, 1926
126 Misc. 584; 214 N.Y.S. 104; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 605

Counsel

Emanuel Morganlander, for the appellant.

Birmberg v. Isquith

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The identical motion having previously been denied by a justice of the New York City Municipal Court without leave to renew it could not be brought on again. (Goldenberg v. Adler, 123 N. Y. Supp. 387.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and judgment reinstated.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.