Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Brambir v. Seifert

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 26, 1926

127 Misc. 603; 217 N.Y.S. 127; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1061

Counsel

Kotzen Brothers [Milton M. Siegel of counsel], for the appellants., Max Schmer, for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We cannot assume that the 1924 amendment of section 1425 of the Civil Practice Act (added by Laws of 1921, chap. 199, as amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 514), providing for judgment for rent, was intended, contrary to well-established principles, to warrant the entry of judgment for rent against a tenant not personally served with the precept or who had not appeared in the proceeding. .

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.