Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Kopisar v. Paley

Kopisar v. Paley
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 24, 1926
128 Misc. 463; 219 N.Y.S. 82; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 805

Counsel

Benjamin Kosseff, for the appellant., Joseph G. Wiman, for the respondent.

Kopisar v. Paley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

"As the proofs tending to show error in date fixed for trial are uncontradicted, order denying motion to open default reversed, motion granted and judgment vacated, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and case set down for trial for December twenty-third.

While the record shows that defendant was entitled to have the cause transferred to the borough of Brooklyn, the order denying the motion to transfer the action, in the absence of an appeal from judgment or final order, is not appealable as an intermediate order (Mun. Ct. Code, § 155), and the appeal from that order is dismissed.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.