Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926

Littlejohn & Co. v. Ellerman & Bucknall Steamship Co.

Littlejohn & Co. v. Ellerman & Bucknall Steamship Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1926
135 Misc. 237; 236 N.Y.S. 699; 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1128

Counsel

Theodore L. Bailey [Arthur E. Muller of counsel], for the appellant., Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating [Alvah H. Combs of counsel], for the respondent.

Littlejohn & Co. v. Ellerman & Bucknall Steamship Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In accordance with the rule laid down in The Rosalia ([C. C. A.] 264 Fed. 285, at p. 288) the evidence raised a presumption of unseaworthiness or of negligence, and, the defendant *238having failed to sustain the burden of showing affirmatively that the damage arose from an excepted peril, the evidence tending to establish merely a doubt in that regard, it was error to award judgment for defendant.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed in favor of plaintiff for $467, with interest and costs.

Present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.