Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927

Riccardi v. Rogosin

Riccardi v. Rogosin
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 20, 1927
131 Misc. 46; 225 N.Y.S. 657; 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1244

Counsel

Feigin & Feigin [Harold H. Feigin of counsel], for the appellants., Samuel J. Siegel, for the respondent.

Riccardi v. Rogosin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Although there seems to be no precedent for the motion in precisely the form in which it is made, no objection apparently has been taken either below or here to its mere form. It is substantially a motion made to facilitate the proper settlement of the case. Defendants claim, and there is no contradiction, that some ten pages of the minutes containing colloquy between the trial court and defendants’ counsel have been omitted and that they include remarks by the court which defendants’ counsel consider prejudicial and which must, in pursuance of his duty to his client, be submitted to the appellate court on the appeal. There is no denial, either, of the fact that these remarks had been taken down by the stenographer. The appropriate provisions of the Judiciary Law entitle appellants to the relief which they have asked.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.