Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928

Dietz v. Weisthal

Dietz v. Weisthal
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 15, 1928
131 Misc. 597; 227 N.Y.S. 568; 1928 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 753

Counsel

Becht & Glaser, for the appellant., Benjamin B. Weinberg, for the respondent.

Dietz v. Weisthal

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s counsel having been actually engaged in the trial of a case in the Supreme Court and having presented an affidavit to the court, defendant was entitled to an adjournment.

The order opening the default is modified by striking out the terms imposed, and as so modified is affirmed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.