Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929

Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley

Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 14, 1929
135 Misc. 213; 237 N.Y.S. 374; 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 940

Counsel

Harry G. Fromberg, for the appellant., Abraham I. Smolens, for the respondent.

Great Woodworking Co. v. Walley

Opinion of the Court

'er Curiam.

Section 17 of the Municipal Court Code still requires that actions be brought in the districts in which either the plaintiff or the defendant resides or has a place for the transaction of business. Although the specific procedure to be followed where an action is brought in the wrong district formerly contained in subdivision 2 of the section has been omitted from the amended, section the court is required to enforce the statute and change the venue when a proper application is made.

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered in the Second District, Borough of Manhattan, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Callahan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.