Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929

Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell

Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 28, 1929
135 Misc. 269; 238 N.Y.S. 21; 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 985

Counsel

Black, Varian & Simon [Herbert M. Simon of counsel], for the appellant., Robert Mazet [Wm. H. Wack of counsel], for the respondent.

Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Daniell

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Parol evidence was inadmissible to relieve the defendant from liability under the contracts signed by him. (Meyer v. Redmond, 205 N. Y. 478.) Although the plaintiff made no motion for the direction of & verdict, and a verdict was directed for the defendant, under section 584 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 215 of the Laws of 1926, the appellate court upon reversal is authorized to render final judgment on the right of the parties. (United Paper Board Co. v. Iroquois Pulp & Paper Co., 217 App. Div. 253; affd., 249 N. Y. 588.)

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint.

All concur; present, Bijur, Lydon and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.