Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930

Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.

Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 2, 1930
137 Misc. 103; 243 N.Y.S. 55; 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1354

Counsel

James E. Smith, Jr., for the appellant., Jacob M. Mandelbaum [Sidney Handler of counsel], for the respondent.

Pullam v. Greater Eagle Wet Wash-Laundry Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law and new trial granted, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

The judgment in favor of Guglielmo against the plaintiff, in an action in which the plaintiff and the defendant in this suit were parties defendant, was not res adjudicata as to the issues involved in the instant suit (Self v. International Railway Co., 224 App. Div. 238; Report of Appellate Term, No. 23, January term, 1930.) No opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.