Pitman v. White
Pitman v. White
138 Misc. 556; 246 N.Y.S. 619; 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1705
Opinion of the Court
The provisions of the lease with regard to the effect of non-payment of rent created a condition and not a conditional limitation. (Burnee Corp. v. Uneeda Pure Orange Drink Co., 132 Misc. 435.) While a summary proceeding might have been brought under subdivision 2 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act, for failure to pay the rent, the present proceeding, brought under subdivision 1 on the theory that the term had expired, will not he.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.