Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930

Waydale Corp. v. Pearlman

Waydale Corp. v. Pearlman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 16, 1930
138 Misc. 714; 248 N.Y.S. 299; 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1775

Counsel

Propper & Lichtig [Karl Propper of counsel], for the appellant., Abraham N. Pearlman, for the respondent.

Waydale Corp. v. Pearlman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We deem it imperative to comment upon the slovenly and careless manner in which records on appeal are submitted, without the slightest regard for the proper form of final orders and judgments, or the distinction between decisions and judgments.

As there is neither judgment nor final order included in the return in this case the appeal is dismissed.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.