Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Ball v. Nippon Yusen Kaisha

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 25, 1932 · Callahan, Levy

143 Misc. 243; 256 N.Y.S. 298; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 959

Counsel

Hardin, Hess & Eder [.Harold B. Elgar and Frank Bashap of counsel], for appellant Canadian Pacific Railway Company., Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper [Bay Bood Allen and Burton H. White of counsel], for the appellant Nippon Yusen Kaisha., Single & Single [Gregory S. Bivkins and Frank H. Gerrodette of counsel], for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. (143 Misc. 239), decided herewith.

Concurring Opinion

Levy, J.

I concur in result for reasons indicated by me in Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. (143 Misc. 229), decided herewith.

Concurring Opinion

Callahan, J.

I concur for reasons stated by me in Brown v. Canadian Pacific R. Co. (143 Misc. 239), and Baltimore Pub. Co. v. Swedish-Am. Mex. Line, Ltd. (Id. 229), decided herewith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.