Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Teplitzky v. Lippman

Teplitzky v. Lippman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 25, 1932
143 Misc. 244; 256 N.Y.S. 410; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 961

Counsel

Levine & Gold [Irving Levine of counsel], for the appellant., Louis Cohn, for the respondents.

Teplitzky v. Lippman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Service of the summons by leaving it at the office of the Secretary of State in the city of New York, coupled with compliance by plaintiff with the other provisions of section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 57), sufficed to give the court jurisdiction of the defendants. (Stoibor v. Marinacci, 142 Misc. 345; affd., 235 App. Div. 714.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Lydon, Frankenthaler andUntermyer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.