Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Block v. Farley

Block v. Farley
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 12, 1932
143 Misc. 785; 257 N.Y.S. 392; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1093

Counsel

John F. Keating, for the appellant., Abraham S. Sara&ohn, for the respondent.

Block v. Farley

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

While, ordinarily, the United States courts are courts of limited jurisdiction they are given exclusive jurisdiction in bankruptcy and, therefore, their orders and judgments possess all the incidents and qualities of finality of courts of general jurisdiction in such matters. (Sabin v. Larkin-Green Logging Co., 218 Fed. 984.) In the instant case it appeared on the face of the order discharging the prisoner that it was made in bankruptcy proceedings, which was the fact. Therefore, the ministerial officer was protected in obeying the order of discharge. {Levy v. Melody, 50 Misc. 509.)

Order modified to the extent of denying the motion to dismiss the first separate defense, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untekmyer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.