Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Polk Arms, Inc. v. Kohler

Polk Arms, Inc. v. Kohler
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided July 18, 1932
144 Misc. 326; 258 N.Y.S. 809; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1516

Counsel

Dunnington, Gregg & Church [John J. O’Brien of counsel], for the appellant., McLaughlin & Stern [P. J. Starkman of counsel], for the respondent.

Polk Arms, Inc. v. Kohler

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record indicates that the trial court found as matter of law that the noises emanating from the apartment overhead could not support the tenant’s claim of constructive eviction. (Seaboard Realty Co. v. Fuller, 33 Misc. 109.) In view of the pertinent provisions of the lease, including that which empowered the landlord to terminate conduct disturbing to the other occupants of the building, and the proof that here the landlord took no effective steps to remedy conditions after ample notice, we think sufficient facts were presented to require the court to pass on the merits of the defense. (Levine & Rosen v. Hence, App. Term, Oct. 1931.)

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Untermyer, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.