Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932

Brooks v. Brooks

Brooks v. Brooks
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 15, 1932
146 Misc. 335; 261 N.Y.S. 211; 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686

Counsel

Kreutzer & Slack [Meyer H. Slack of counsel], for the appellant., Hays, St. John, Abramson & Schulman [Alan S. Hays of counsel], for the respondent.

Brooks v. Brooks

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant. It is conceded that defendant’s original entry upon the premises was lawful, and, therefore, she was not an intruder or a squatter within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (6 Wait N. Y. Prac. [3d ed.] 300, and cases cited; Matter of Stockwell v. Washburn, 59 Misc. 543; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 id. 367; Williams v. Alt, 186 App. Div. 235; affd., 226 N. Y. 283.)

All concur; present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.