Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Lent v. City of New York

Lent v. City of New York
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 22, 1934
150 Misc. 291; 269 N.Y.S. 201; 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1065

Counsel

Arthur J. W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel, for the appellant., Maurice Breen, for the respondent.

Lent v. City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

As plaintiff, although appointed as a result of a civil service examination for electrical inspector, performed the duties of an electrician after duly passing a civil service examination for that position, he is entitled to the benefits of subdivision 3 of section 220 of the Labor Law.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.