Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 21, 1934
152 Misc. 274; 273 N.Y.S. 198; 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1458

Counsel

Reuben S. Levins, for the appellant., Fred Goldman, for the respondent.

LaSalle Extension University v. Pappace

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Once a case has been settled pursuant to stipulation it is finally terminated and may not be set down for trial on motion. The defendant, respondent’s remedy is not a motion to set aside the judgment entered pursuant to such settlement. *275He may bring suit for breach of the terms of such stipulation. (Naegeli Furniture Co. v. Holstein, 175 N. Y. Supp. 779, and cases cited therein.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.