Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934

Harris v. New York Athletic Club

Harris v. New York Athletic Club
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 6, 1934 · Hammer, Lydon, Shientag
153 Misc. 840; 276 N.Y.S. 211; 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2014

Counsel

Albert Harris, for the appellant., William A. Earl, for the respondent.

Harris v. New York Athletic Club

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Section 1078 of the Civil Practice Act does not prohibit the plaintiff from pursuing her cause of action on a coupon attached to a bond securing a second mortgage while the action is pending to foreclose a first mortgage. (See Reichert v. Stilwell, 172 N. Y. 83.) It was, therefore, error to deny summary judgment.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted.

All concur; present, Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.