Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935

Travelers Insurance v. Russo

Travelers Insurance v. Russo
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 10, 1935
155 Misc. 589; 280 N.Y.S. 99; 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1199

Counsel

Giaimo & Nicolosi [Frank M. Nicolosi of counsel], for the appellant., William J. Moran [Bernard J. McGlinn of counsel], for the respondent.

Travelers Insurance v. Russo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Any terms of an automobile liability policy which violate section 109 of the Insurance Law or limit the free force and effect thereof are illegal. Nevertheless the policy will be held valid and deemed to include the provisions required by that section. (Bakker v. Ætna Life Ins. Co., 264 N. Y. 150.) This rule controls the rights, duties and obligations of the insurer and the policyholder. We construe the present contract as attempting to limit the statutory provisions. It is, therefore, illegal and may not be enforced.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.