Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935

Black Diamond Steamship Corp. v. S. H. Kress & Co.

Black Diamond Steamship Corp. v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 21, 1935
157 Misc. 360; 284 N.Y.S. 310; 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1639

Counsel

Hunt, Hill & Betts [William Logan, Jr., of counsel], for the appellant., Holm, Whitlock & Scarff [Ira Mar sop Cohen of counsel], for the respondent.

Black Diamond Steamship Corp. v. S. H. Kress & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Among the discriminatory acts prohibited by the United States Shipping Act (39 U. S. Stat. at Large, 734, §§ 16, 17; U. S. Code, tit. 46, §§ 815, 816) is the giving of unreasonable preference in rates to any shipper. Here the plaintiff was a member of a steamship conference which had filed rates and said rates having been approved and published had the effect of tariffs. The contract rates between the parties being less than the published rates would constitute a discriminatory act if enforced. The defendant may not enforce same even though it was in ignorance of the published tariffs. The contract itself would constitute a device that was unfair to other shippers.

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for the plaintiff for the amount demanded in the complaint, and dismissing the counterclaims, on the merits, with costs.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.