Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936

Cohen v. Paprocki

Cohen v. Paprocki
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 9, 1936
158 Misc. 465; 286 N.Y.S. 26; 1936 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 990

Counsel

Patent, Stern & Rachstein, for the appellant., Sol H. Glaubman, for the respondents.

Cohen v. Paprocki

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The procedure for obtaining a bill of particulars in an action in the Municipal Court of the City of New York is provided for in subdivision 7 of section 78 of the Municipal Court Code. The board of justices of the Municipal Court was, therefore, without authority to adopt rule 17 of the Central Motion Part Rules, because such rule contravenes subdivision 7 of section 78 of the Municipal Court Code and attempts to regulate a matter of procedure specifically provided for by law.

Order denying plaintiff’s application to vacate the order reversed and order vacated and set aside, with ten dollars costs to the appellant.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Frankenthaler, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.